Upon searching around several sites, and sitting in front of the TV while attempting homework, a recent news story caught my attention. ABC’s evening local news reported on an arrest that took place in West Oakland at a BART station on Saturday. Michael Joseph Gibson, a 37 year old man was causing a disturbance while on board. He was considered intoxicated and was yelling at other passengers. Soon after a BART policeman boards and takes him off the train. The policeman makes his way toward a wall to complete his arrest, the plait glass from the window in front of the pair shatters.
The recount is accompanied with a video taken from a witness’s cell phone. The video is taken from afar, and at an angle where you mostly see the policeman’s back. Many people are saying that this is another display of police using unnecessary force, and relating it to a previous BART incident where police shot a civilian on accident.
The article from the San Jose Mercury unravels Gibson’s background of mentally instability and being bipolar.
One thing I want to address is the fact that the YouTube video played a key part. Without it, this news piece wouldn’t have as much impact if it was just reported by the news casters and read by newspaper readers. With everyone jumping on the trend of upgrading their phones, especially phones with cameras, there is a slow growing trend of videos that are blurry, sometimes with out-of-sync audio beginning to surface as resources for news stories. Sure it is convenient, and it does give us more visuals about the situation, but it also has some negative impacts. These videos are usually shot at vague angles that do give the gist of events but sometimes not enough details. In the case for Gibson and the unnamed policeman, many people are speculating that it’s the policeman’s fault the glass broke, because he slammed Gibson hard into the glass. When watched the first time, it looks like he did, but after watching it a second time you begin to notice Gibson’s arm that the policeman isn’t holding on it is thrown out. For some this video is just another bad impression of the police force. For others it’s an example of a mentally unsound drunk man, someone who should be avoided.
So who is at fault for the broken glass? In my opinion, I believe both of them contributed to breaking the glass window. It is a known fact that when one is about to collide with any surface, by instinct hands are thrown out to cushion the impact. Such is demonstrated by Gibson’s free arm being thrown out. And in order to complete an arrest, an officer usually forces the person up against the wall, or on the ground. In the policeman’s case, he was pushing Gibson’s body up against the wall to arrest him which requires force to direct the man forward. With the aide of the policeman’s force, the strength in Gibson’s outstretched hand penetrated the glass, causing it to break.
My conclusion is based off of what I call common sense, and my budding imagination. So it’s possible I may be wrong.
sources:
http://www.mercurynews.com/top-stories/ci_13848161






